Performance Calibration

Performance Calibration is a two-step process that includes supervisors who are responsible for conducting the performance evaluations and the reviewer who examines the employee evaluations. The calibration process provides a forum for discussion of employees’ performance with the goal of making sure supervisors apply similar standards for all employees and eliminate biases to the greatest extent possible. Calibration happens after the employee submits the self-reflection and the supervisor completes the evaluation, but before the final evaluation is shared and signed.Ìý

What are the benefits of calibrating performance ratings?Ìý
  • Ensures supervisors are well-versed in the definitions and application of the rating scaleÌý
  • Helps supervisors have thoughtful reasons as to why they gave a particular rating to an employeeÌý
  • Helps prepare supervisors to have better performance discussions with their employees; provides supervisors with more confidence in their ratings after discussing the rating in a calibration meetingÌý
  • Ensures a more consistent and fair evaluation of an employee performance by identifying potential supervisor and reviewer biasesÌý
  • Establishes a clear and well-founded rationale for merit increases based on performanceÌý
  • Provides for better professional development and succession planning as more people managers get insights into the capabilities of employees from other areasÌý
Ìý
  • Upon completion of employee evaluations and before holding the evaluation meeting with the employee, the evaluations should be sent to the reviewer. The reviewer is usually the supervisor manager, but that may vary in certain colleges and departments.Ìý
  • The reviewer reads each evaluation, looking in particular for constructive supervisory comments and ensuring evaluations are thorough and logical. If the reviewer decides a supervisor should alter a particular evaluation, the reviewer sends the evaluation back and waits for a revision.Ìý
  • Once all employee evaluations have been examined and agreed upon by the reviewer – and any necessary changes are made, then a meeting is scheduled between all college/department reviewers. Supervisors may also be in attendance at these meetings if desired. It is up to the particular college and department to determine the level of participation at the calibration meeting.
  • The supervisor comes prepared to the meeting with their proposed scores approved by the reviewer. The executive leader holds a meeting with all the reviewers and supervisors if desired.
  • In this meeting, the participants look at the rating distributions for the entire college/department and ensure the ratings are being consistently and fairly applied to all employees and that no single supervisor is giving all employees the same numeric rating.Ìý
  • This is an opportunity for supervisors to discuss any scores they are uncertain about with the other reviewers. The group may ask questions about specific ratings and may suggest adjustments based on their experience with the employee.Ìý
  • Following the discussion, reviewers ensure that the supervisors understand any changes that need to be made to the evaluations and that these changes are made prior to having the in-person performance evaluation meeting with the employee.

Ìý

Tips for a successful calibration process

Communicate College/Department Goals: Goals for each area should be communicated in advance and as thoroughly as possible so employees understand how their daily work contributes to the success of the college/department and so that employees understand the measures on which they will be evaluated.Ìý

  • Educate supervisors: They need to understand what calibration is, why it is necessary, how it works, and what their role is.Ìý
  • Don’t hide the process from employees: It could demotivate employees if the calibration process is seen as secretive. Be open about the process, but maintain confidentiality outside of the calibration meeting.Ìý
  • Don’t expect perfection:  The calibration process is imperfect because the people using it are imperfect. Each calibration meeting should have checks and balances built in so leaders are held accountable for their evaluation decisions.Ìý
  • Get the right people involved:  Make sure that the reviewer can adequately represent the employees being discussed at the calibration meeting or invite the supervisors if their input is needed.Ìý
  • Set appropriate ground rules for meetings: Participants must feel open to challenge and debate. They must also feel comfortable asking their peers for advice if they need help in determining or communicating a rating.Ìý
  • Leverage the information gathered during the process: The power of calibration goes beyond performance ratings. These discussions yield important insight into your top performers and your employee who are struggling. Keep this in mind as you set up goals think about your talent pool for the next performance cycle and beyond.Ìý

Ìý